For Independent Sponsors: The Performance Gap Has Closed, but the Credibility Gap Remains

For years, independent sponsor deals were treated as lesser transactions. The scraps of the lower middle market, left to small family offices and the former private equity dealmakers who’d struck out on their own. Not anymore. These deals are outperforming, and the same institutional capital that once passed is now lining up to back independent sponsors.

A study by the Institute for Private Capital, conducted in collaboration with the Small Business Investor Alliance and its Independent Sponsor Forum, examined 846 independent sponsor transactions. The study found independent sponsor deals delivered a median IRR of 23.8% against 18.5% for a matched buyout benchmark, a 5.3-percentage-point edge, net of sponsor economics. Independent sponsor investments also generated an average TVPI (Total Value to Paid-In) of 2.86x, versus 2.13x for the benchmark.

Importantly, the higher returns did not appear to come from simply accepting more downside risk. Loss rates were 23.5% for independent sponsor transactions versus 21.6% for the matched private equity benchmark, a difference the researchers found to be statistically indistinguishable.

The Certainty-to-Close Problem

The evidence does not suggest that every independent sponsor will outperform every funded private equity firm. It does suggest that the model is capable of producing institutional-quality outcomes and may still be underestimated in parts of the deal market.

Strong returns, however, do not eliminate the independent sponsor’s most immediate disadvantage. In a competitive process, sellers and their advisors are not evaluating the return a buyer may generate five years after closing. They are assessing whether the buyer can fund the transaction, complete diligence without losing momentum, respond decisively when issues emerge, and reach closing on the agreed timeline.

A funded private equity firm can demonstrate that readiness through committed capital. An independent sponsor must demonstrate it through preparation, capital relationships, and the strength of the team surrounding the transaction.

That creates a disconnect. Independent sponsors may be capable of producing competitive, or superior, investment outcomes and still lose attractive opportunities because their path to capital appears less visible or less certain. The independent sponsor market doesn’t have a performance problem. It has a certainty-to-close problem.

Bankers Edge Was Built for the Independent Sponsor Model

Bankers Edge works as an extension of the independent sponsor’s deal team. We help sponsors develop the capital strategy, position the opportunity, coordinate lender and investor engagement, and build a reliable path from initial interest to funded transaction. Improving certainty-to-close for the seller and their team.

Our role is not merely to introduce capital after a deal has been signed. It is to help independent sponsors approach sellers, intermediaries, and capital providers with the preparation and institutional readiness expected of the most competitive buyers.

Independent sponsors have demonstrated that the model can produce compelling investment outcomes. The remaining opportunity is to ensure that sellers and their advisors recognize that capability early enough for it to influence which buyer wins.

Certainty to close starts before the LOI. That’s where Bankers Edge starts. We help you navigate the capital markets with greater confidence – let’s connect!

Bankers Edge Advisory  |  Results Driven Engagements

Source: Institute for Private Capital, in collaboration with the Small Business Investor Alliance and Independent Sponsor Forum; study of 846 independent sponsor transactions.

Search Here
Categories & Tags
Recent Posts

"*" indicates required fields

Name*
Max. file size: 50 MB.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Meet Mitch Vermet,

CFA, CAIA
Managing Director
Our other Managing Director, Mitch Vermet, CFA, CAIA, has a decade of experience in institutional asset management and investment banking. He has served as an integral asset within close-knit investment teams responsible for building portfolios and allocating tactical assets for over $30 billion in institutional capital.
Since earning a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan and an MA in Management from the Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan, Mr. Vermet has demonstrated mastery in helping clients manage and structure their balance sheets with strategic asset liability management solutions. He has built a reputation for helping clients strategically manage risk while capitalizing on opportunities across unique macroeconomic scenarios, lending valuable expertise and foresight to clients.  

Mr. Vermet is a member of the CFA Institute and CAIA Association. He is also a Registered Representative of BA Securities, LLC, and a member of FINRA and SIPC.

Meet Richard Consul,

CFA
Managing Director
Richard Consul, CFA, brings unmatched expertise and experience as one of our Managing Directors. Mr. Consul has over 20 years of domestic and international secondary market expertise as a Senior Portfolio Manager and Fixed Income, Currency, and Commodities Strategist.
Since earning a BBA in Finance and an MSE in Financial Engineering from the University of Michigan, Mr. Consul has served as a dedicated business partner to many corporate, banking, and insurance clients. He has built a reputation for helping clients solve and overcome various complex liquidity, risk management, ALM, and secondary market challenges. 
Mr. Consul has lent his expertise to countless financial publications and platforms, including Asset TV, a renowned video research platform for investment professionals. He is a member of the CFA Institute and has received certifications in Securities Industry Essentials (SIE), Series 82, and Series 63 through FINRA.